Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Nov. 30, 1967) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana MEETING FARM LABOR NEEDS FARMERS ARE FACED with a very short labor supply that isn't likely to improve in the foreseeable future. Farm wage rates seem high but are almost sure to go higher. Top grain and livestock farmers can't afford to use other than high calibre labor which also provides considerable management ability along with labor. This type of labor has many alternative opportunities, and it will take many inducements to attract and hold it on the farm. Wages competitive with industry, good labor relations and modernized fringe benefits are a must. Incentive agreements offer opportunities but certainly are no panacea for solving the labor problem. Bringing one or more high calibre young men into the business as operating partners is worthy of consideration. Since 1950 the U.S. farm labor force and the man- hours of labor used for farm work have been reduced by about one-half. Most indications point to a continued rapid decline in farm labor in the years immediately ahead. Percentage decrease in the farm labor force of Indiana in recent years has been somewhat greater than the national average. In the first half of 1967 the total farm labor force of Indiana was 134,000 of which 124,000 was family labor and 10,000 hired labor. Compared to the 1961-65 average, Indiana's family labor force has declined 27 percent, and the hired labor force has declined about 38 percent. Why the rapid decline in the farm labor force? Good off-farm employment opportunities with high off-farm wage rates account for most of the decline. Table 1 shows the average U.S. farm wage rate and industrial wage rate for selected years. Farm wages have averaged 36 to 39 percent of industrial wages since 1950 and the gap hasn't narrowed. The hired farm labor force does include a higher percentage of unskilled, marginal workers than would be true Table 1. Farm wages as a percent of industrial wages and average hourly wage rates in the U.S. Year Hourly wage rate Farm wages as percent of industrial Farm workers wages (dollars) Industrial workers (dollars) Difference (dollars) 1950 39 .56 1.44 .88 1960 36 .82 2.26 1.44 1965 36 .95 2.61 1.66 1966 38 1.03 2.69 1.66 *The Farm Cost Situation 1967 Outlook Issue, USDA. November 30, 1967 ii m nTTrrm rrrm INDIANA FARMERS Paul R. Robbins, Agricidtural Economics of the industrial work force which accounts for part of the wage difference. But, it seems clear that off- farm employers have been winning the competitive battle for the workers' services. Some farmers realizing the keen competition for labor have been not only pushing up wage rates but also improving working conditions, updating fringe benefits, etc., in an effort to attract and hold competent employees. All indications point to a continued very short farm labor supply in the foreseeable future. Farm operators will have to put forth even greater effort if they are to attract and hold the calibre of labor needed. How To Meet Labor Needs Following are some of the ways that Indiana farmers are attempting to meet labor needs. 1. Substitution of capital for labor has been occurring at a rapid rate. The three-plow tractor and two-row corn picker is rapidly being replaced with the six- or eight-plow tractor and four-row or larger corn combine. There has been a rapid shift to confinement production of swine, with the shortage of labor being a very important factor stimulating this change. Many opportunities for substituting capital for labor will be presented as labor costs continue to rise and new technology becomes available. Up-to-date technical information on capital- labor substitution rates for various enterprises is badly needed to guide farmers in making investments. 2. The purchase of labor as a package along with other inputs to help meet the tight labor problem. Custom applications of fertilizers, custom harvesting, off-farm processing of feeds and bulk delivery of feeds to the feeders are examples of labor purchases along with the purchase of a product or the services of machinery and equipment. Such labor purchases will permit greater output with a fixed farm labor supply and may help greatly in meeting peak labor requirements. 3. The hiring of part-time labor offers real possibilities, especially near industrial areas. There are many non-farm workers with farm backgrounds; some have had considerable experience with machinery and equipment. What incentive would be required to induce more of these people to work part-time on the farm? A relatively few days of very high cost hired labor to meet peak requirements is often less costly than a full-time employee who isn't really needed full time.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Nov. 30, 1967) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196711 |
Date of Original | 1967 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 05/01/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196711.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Nov. 30, 1967) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196711 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana MEETING FARM LABOR NEEDS FARMERS ARE FACED with a very short labor supply that isn't likely to improve in the foreseeable future. Farm wage rates seem high but are almost sure to go higher. Top grain and livestock farmers can't afford to use other than high calibre labor which also provides considerable management ability along with labor. This type of labor has many alternative opportunities, and it will take many inducements to attract and hold it on the farm. Wages competitive with industry, good labor relations and modernized fringe benefits are a must. Incentive agreements offer opportunities but certainly are no panacea for solving the labor problem. Bringing one or more high calibre young men into the business as operating partners is worthy of consideration. Since 1950 the U.S. farm labor force and the man- hours of labor used for farm work have been reduced by about one-half. Most indications point to a continued rapid decline in farm labor in the years immediately ahead. Percentage decrease in the farm labor force of Indiana in recent years has been somewhat greater than the national average. In the first half of 1967 the total farm labor force of Indiana was 134,000 of which 124,000 was family labor and 10,000 hired labor. Compared to the 1961-65 average, Indiana's family labor force has declined 27 percent, and the hired labor force has declined about 38 percent. Why the rapid decline in the farm labor force? Good off-farm employment opportunities with high off-farm wage rates account for most of the decline. Table 1 shows the average U.S. farm wage rate and industrial wage rate for selected years. Farm wages have averaged 36 to 39 percent of industrial wages since 1950 and the gap hasn't narrowed. The hired farm labor force does include a higher percentage of unskilled, marginal workers than would be true Table 1. Farm wages as a percent of industrial wages and average hourly wage rates in the U.S. Year Hourly wage rate Farm wages as percent of industrial Farm workers wages (dollars) Industrial workers (dollars) Difference (dollars) 1950 39 .56 1.44 .88 1960 36 .82 2.26 1.44 1965 36 .95 2.61 1.66 1966 38 1.03 2.69 1.66 *The Farm Cost Situation 1967 Outlook Issue, USDA. November 30, 1967 ii m nTTrrm rrrm INDIANA FARMERS Paul R. Robbins, Agricidtural Economics of the industrial work force which accounts for part of the wage difference. But, it seems clear that off- farm employers have been winning the competitive battle for the workers' services. Some farmers realizing the keen competition for labor have been not only pushing up wage rates but also improving working conditions, updating fringe benefits, etc., in an effort to attract and hold competent employees. All indications point to a continued very short farm labor supply in the foreseeable future. Farm operators will have to put forth even greater effort if they are to attract and hold the calibre of labor needed. How To Meet Labor Needs Following are some of the ways that Indiana farmers are attempting to meet labor needs. 1. Substitution of capital for labor has been occurring at a rapid rate. The three-plow tractor and two-row corn picker is rapidly being replaced with the six- or eight-plow tractor and four-row or larger corn combine. There has been a rapid shift to confinement production of swine, with the shortage of labor being a very important factor stimulating this change. Many opportunities for substituting capital for labor will be presented as labor costs continue to rise and new technology becomes available. Up-to-date technical information on capital- labor substitution rates for various enterprises is badly needed to guide farmers in making investments. 2. The purchase of labor as a package along with other inputs to help meet the tight labor problem. Custom applications of fertilizers, custom harvesting, off-farm processing of feeds and bulk delivery of feeds to the feeders are examples of labor purchases along with the purchase of a product or the services of machinery and equipment. Such labor purchases will permit greater output with a fixed farm labor supply and may help greatly in meeting peak labor requirements. 3. The hiring of part-time labor offers real possibilities, especially near industrial areas. There are many non-farm workers with farm backgrounds; some have had considerable experience with machinery and equipment. What incentive would be required to induce more of these people to work part-time on the farm? A relatively few days of very high cost hired labor to meet peak requirements is often less costly than a full-time employee who isn't really needed full time. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Nov. 30, 1967)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Nov. 30, 1967)