Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1963) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana July 31, 1963 The Rise In Meat Imports reasons and remedies by Don Paarlberg, Agricultural Economics Quantity Imports of United as per Imports States pro cent of pro Item Value Quantity duction1 duction The United States, once a net ex- bers of feeder cattle. Likewise signifi- Major United States export items porter of animals and animal prod- cant were the "down under" coun- in the livestock field are hides and ucts, has become a net importer tries, Australia and New Zealand, skins, inedible tallow, lard, non-fat (Table 1). which shipped in mostly boned beef dry milk (mostly donated), chicken, Imports of beef and veal in 1962 for hamburger and processed meat, turkey and variety meats, totaled a record 1.4 billion pounds Europe supplied a surprising amount Roughly half our agricultural im- (carcass weight equivalent). This was of meat, chiefly delicacies and spe- ports compete directly with our own equivalent to nearly 9 percent of cialty products. Argentina was an- production, while the other half is United States production of beef and other supplier (Table 4). not directly competitive, veal. In addition, 1,250,000 head of cattle and calves were imported, a Table 2. Imports of beef, veal and cattle, and comparison with number which equals 3.6 percent of United States production, 1962 the cattle slaughtered (Table 2). While beef was imported in greater quantity than any other meat, substantial quantities of pork and lamb also were shipped into the country million million million percent (Tablp 3) dollars pounds pounds '' i.i. Meat Products Meat and cattle on which import Beef: duties were paid came from a large Bone-in, fresh, chilled, frozen ^5.7 ^18.8 number of countries. Very important Canned, including corned 28.5 84.0 were our near neighbors, Canada and Pjckfled and c,ured °'Q 9?1 ° . Veal, fresh or frozen 8.y 25.5 Mexico, which supplied large num- Other meat, canned, prepared, or preserved, n.e.c.2 10.6 23.1 Table 1. Exports and imports of _, . ~312.I 9710 animals and animal products, Total, carcass weight equivalent 1,454.0 16,300 8.9 1939-1962. — -— million thousand thousand percent Exports Imports dollars head head Total Total Cattle and calves Year animals animals Under 200 pounds 2.0 66 beginning and and 200-700 pounds 85.4 1,042 July 1 products products 700 pounds and over, dairy 3.7 16 ~ 700 pounds and over, n.e.s.3 19.3 109 thousand dollars Average „„ 0„0 Bulls for breeding 0.9 1 1939-43 609,869 33d,342 c for breedi 5.2 16 1944-48 757,384 415,544 6 1949-53 366,200 703,522 T . , H6.5 1,250 34,700* 3.6 1954-58 597,464 549,486 — — An1o^o1ro M9 199 7R7 07^ iCommercial as reported, plus estimates for farm. Kin St'irS 69S846 2*ot elsewhere classified. luSlSl £lml %liu 3Not elsewhere specified. Q*?"S ^'nod 82?3?5 thousand head slaughtered. 1961-621 627,094 tSZMia Source: Agricultural Marketing Service. Compiled from data of Foreign Agricultural 1 Preliminary Service.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1963) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196307 |
Date of Original | 1963 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 04/02/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196307.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1963) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196307 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana July 31, 1963 The Rise In Meat Imports reasons and remedies by Don Paarlberg, Agricultural Economics Quantity Imports of United as per Imports States pro cent of pro Item Value Quantity duction1 duction The United States, once a net ex- bers of feeder cattle. Likewise signifi- Major United States export items porter of animals and animal prod- cant were the "down under" coun- in the livestock field are hides and ucts, has become a net importer tries, Australia and New Zealand, skins, inedible tallow, lard, non-fat (Table 1). which shipped in mostly boned beef dry milk (mostly donated), chicken, Imports of beef and veal in 1962 for hamburger and processed meat, turkey and variety meats, totaled a record 1.4 billion pounds Europe supplied a surprising amount Roughly half our agricultural im- (carcass weight equivalent). This was of meat, chiefly delicacies and spe- ports compete directly with our own equivalent to nearly 9 percent of cialty products. Argentina was an- production, while the other half is United States production of beef and other supplier (Table 4). not directly competitive, veal. In addition, 1,250,000 head of cattle and calves were imported, a Table 2. Imports of beef, veal and cattle, and comparison with number which equals 3.6 percent of United States production, 1962 the cattle slaughtered (Table 2). While beef was imported in greater quantity than any other meat, substantial quantities of pork and lamb also were shipped into the country million million million percent (Tablp 3) dollars pounds pounds '' i.i. Meat Products Meat and cattle on which import Beef: duties were paid came from a large Bone-in, fresh, chilled, frozen ^5.7 ^18.8 number of countries. Very important Canned, including corned 28.5 84.0 were our near neighbors, Canada and Pjckfled and c,ured °'Q 9?1 ° . Veal, fresh or frozen 8.y 25.5 Mexico, which supplied large num- Other meat, canned, prepared, or preserved, n.e.c.2 10.6 23.1 Table 1. Exports and imports of _, . ~312.I 9710 animals and animal products, Total, carcass weight equivalent 1,454.0 16,300 8.9 1939-1962. — -— million thousand thousand percent Exports Imports dollars head head Total Total Cattle and calves Year animals animals Under 200 pounds 2.0 66 beginning and and 200-700 pounds 85.4 1,042 July 1 products products 700 pounds and over, dairy 3.7 16 ~ 700 pounds and over, n.e.s.3 19.3 109 thousand dollars Average „„ 0„0 Bulls for breeding 0.9 1 1939-43 609,869 33d,342 c for breedi 5.2 16 1944-48 757,384 415,544 6 1949-53 366,200 703,522 T . , H6.5 1,250 34,700* 3.6 1954-58 597,464 549,486 — — An1o^o1ro M9 199 7R7 07^ iCommercial as reported, plus estimates for farm. Kin St'irS 69S846 2*ot elsewhere classified. luSlSl £lml %liu 3Not elsewhere specified. Q*?"S ^'nod 82?3?5 thousand head slaughtered. 1961-621 627,094 tSZMia Source: Agricultural Marketing Service. Compiled from data of Foreign Agricultural 1 Preliminary Service. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1963)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 31, 1963)