Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (May 31, 1961) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana May 31, 1961 Costs and Profits in Hog Production by RONALD H. BAUMAN and LUDWIG M. EISGRUBER, Agricultural Economics Low costs and high profits in hog production are associated with: O a herd-size of about 50 sows (two-litter system), Q a high level of feed conversion, an increasing number of pigs raised per litter, and © the purchase of feed in volume to get the advantages of quantity discounts. But, highly efficient operators with relatively small hog enterprises have production costs per hundredweight as low as most larger producers. These are some of the major conclusions reached from a study of a selected group of central Indiana farms.* Production Costs per Hog Lower for Larger Herds Detailed records, kept in 1956 and 1957 by 118 central Indiana, two-litter, swine producers, showed that average cost of producing a hundred pounds of hogs decreased as enterprise size increased to about 50 sows (Table 1). In herds larger than 50 sows *Progress reports on this study, the AES Project 787, were published in this publication, July 29, 1958 and April 30, 1960. costs per cwt. of hogs produced tended to increase slowly. The decrease in cost per cwt. of hog produced—that is associated with increasing size of enterprise —is almost entirely attributable to changes in costs for labor and capital (use cost of buildings, machinery and equipment, and interest on investment in hogs). Labor cost particularly showed a consistent decline as size of herd increased. When labor was charged at $1.00 per hour, labor cost de- Table 1. Average Cost per Hundred Pounds of Hogs Produced with Various Sizes of Swine Enterprise, Central Indiana, 1956 and 1957. Cost per hundredweight of hogs produced when the size of the enterprise Average (in number of sows farrowed twice per year) is: cost Under 60 and 28 (percent of Cost item 10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 over [average) Total cost) Avg. no. of sows farrowed (2 litters each) 8 No. of enterprises 9 Direct costs Feed* 11.15 Miscellaneous (electricity, taxes, vaccination, etc.) .71 Total 11.86 Fixed costs Use cost of buildings, machinery and equipment 2.38 Interest on avg. investment in hogs (6%) Total Total costs other *han labor Labor cost at ($1.00 Per hr.) Total .41 2.79 14.65 1.29 15.94 15 29 10.71 .87 11.58 2.29 .45 2.74 14.32 1.10 15.42 25 33 10.82 .93 11.75 1.89 .44 2.33 14.08 1 04 15.12 34 22 10.01 .91 10.92 1.79 .43 2 22 13.14 .90 14.04 42 12 9.42 .88 10.30 1.52 .46 1.98 12.28 .76 13.04 53 9 9.46 .76 10.22 1.60 .43 2.03 12.25 .74 12.99 73 4 10.22 .96 11.18 1.63 .50 2.13 13.31 .69 14.10 28 118 10.40 .88 11.28 1.94 .44 2.38 13.66 98 14.64 71.0 6.0 77.0 13.3 3.0 16.3 93.3 6.3 100.0 *The corn price charged was $1.21 per bushel; supplement price charged was S5 per cwt., 35 percent protein equivalent. Cost of the average f*d was $2.55 per cwt. ration
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (May 31, 1961) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196105 |
Date of Original | 1961 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/12/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196105.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (May 31, 1961) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196105 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana May 31, 1961 Costs and Profits in Hog Production by RONALD H. BAUMAN and LUDWIG M. EISGRUBER, Agricultural Economics Low costs and high profits in hog production are associated with: O a herd-size of about 50 sows (two-litter system), Q a high level of feed conversion, an increasing number of pigs raised per litter, and © the purchase of feed in volume to get the advantages of quantity discounts. But, highly efficient operators with relatively small hog enterprises have production costs per hundredweight as low as most larger producers. These are some of the major conclusions reached from a study of a selected group of central Indiana farms.* Production Costs per Hog Lower for Larger Herds Detailed records, kept in 1956 and 1957 by 118 central Indiana, two-litter, swine producers, showed that average cost of producing a hundred pounds of hogs decreased as enterprise size increased to about 50 sows (Table 1). In herds larger than 50 sows *Progress reports on this study, the AES Project 787, were published in this publication, July 29, 1958 and April 30, 1960. costs per cwt. of hogs produced tended to increase slowly. The decrease in cost per cwt. of hog produced—that is associated with increasing size of enterprise —is almost entirely attributable to changes in costs for labor and capital (use cost of buildings, machinery and equipment, and interest on investment in hogs). Labor cost particularly showed a consistent decline as size of herd increased. When labor was charged at $1.00 per hour, labor cost de- Table 1. Average Cost per Hundred Pounds of Hogs Produced with Various Sizes of Swine Enterprise, Central Indiana, 1956 and 1957. Cost per hundredweight of hogs produced when the size of the enterprise Average (in number of sows farrowed twice per year) is: cost Under 60 and 28 (percent of Cost item 10 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 over [average) Total cost) Avg. no. of sows farrowed (2 litters each) 8 No. of enterprises 9 Direct costs Feed* 11.15 Miscellaneous (electricity, taxes, vaccination, etc.) .71 Total 11.86 Fixed costs Use cost of buildings, machinery and equipment 2.38 Interest on avg. investment in hogs (6%) Total Total costs other *han labor Labor cost at ($1.00 Per hr.) Total .41 2.79 14.65 1.29 15.94 15 29 10.71 .87 11.58 2.29 .45 2.74 14.32 1.10 15.42 25 33 10.82 .93 11.75 1.89 .44 2.33 14.08 1 04 15.12 34 22 10.01 .91 10.92 1.79 .43 2 22 13.14 .90 14.04 42 12 9.42 .88 10.30 1.52 .46 1.98 12.28 .76 13.04 53 9 9.46 .76 10.22 1.60 .43 2.03 12.25 .74 12.99 73 4 10.22 .96 11.18 1.63 .50 2.13 13.31 .69 14.10 28 118 10.40 .88 11.28 1.94 .44 2.38 13.66 98 14.64 71.0 6.0 77.0 13.3 3.0 16.3 93.3 6.3 100.0 *The corn price charged was $1.21 per bushel; supplement price charged was S5 per cwt., 35 percent protein equivalent. Cost of the average f*d was $2.55 per cwt. ration |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (May 31, 1961)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (May 31, 1961)