Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Sep. 30, 1961) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana September 30, 1961 Stabilizing the Broiler Industry by Richard D. Darley and Paul L. Farris, Agricultural Economics Increasing concern is being expressed about over- expansion of the broiler industry. Broiler prices, U. S. mid-month average at the local market I or farm) level, dropped from 17.6 cents per pound in February, 1961, to around 12-13 cents in midsummer. Questions have been raised whether such low prices cover production costs. If the industry should desire to stabilize production at prices which cover production costs, or alter broiler marketings and prices in some manner, Seasonal (within the year) and Year to year measures of demand and cost of production would be needed. Alternatives Demand and cost of production information can be used by individuals and groups to increase the industry's stability. Individual action—Estimates of future market prices and information on how to figure production costs could be disseminated to individual members of the industry. The individual could then adjust his own production as he saw best. Group action—Available supply and demand information could be used to determine the quantity of broilers needed to maintain a certain price level and a given price pattern within a year. Quantities that various individuals within the industry would produce would need to be determined. A device for stabilizing the industry through group action might be a marketing order. Members of the broiler industry and other agencies, both public and private, may wish to consider alternative methods of stabilizing extreme fluctuations in broiler production and broiler prices. This article presents some demand estimates of the kind required in whatever method may be employed. Seasonal Variations in Demand Demand in this article is defined as the quantity of broilers that buyers will take at a given price in a given market (the U. S.) at a given time (a certain month). Demand increases if buyers will take more at a given price than in a previous month, or if they w"l pay more for a given quantity than in a previous month. Demand decreases if buyers will take less at a g'ven price, or if they will not pay as much for a given quantity. A recent Purdue study1 shows that the low point in the demand for broilers has come in December l sec Figure 1). From the first of the vear through March. JDarley, Richard D., "Monthly Price Herniating Model? for Broilers,"' unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, August, 1961. The analysis is based on the 1948-60 period. The stud) was conducted under Purdue A.E.S. project 876. •constant marketings at December level INCREASING BROILER DEMAND Percent difference in marketings from December Figure 1. Estimated monthly broiler demand, December-July, 1948-60. This chart shows that in July, for example, an estimated 69.1 percent more broilers could be marketed than in December at the December price. Or, if quantity marketed in July would remain constant at the December level, the price in July would be an estimated 36.2 percent higher. DECREASING BROILER DEMAND %M 21.0 47.0 63.0 69.1 Percent difference in marketings from December Figure 2. Estimated monthly broiler demand, July- December, 1948-60. This chart shows that in August, for example, an estimated 63 percent more broilers could be marketed than in December at the December price. Or, if quantity marketed in August would remain constant at the December level, the price in August would be an estimated 33.6 percent higher.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Sep. 30, 1961) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196109 |
Date of Original | 1961 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/12/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196109.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Sep. 30, 1961) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196109 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana September 30, 1961 Stabilizing the Broiler Industry by Richard D. Darley and Paul L. Farris, Agricultural Economics Increasing concern is being expressed about over- expansion of the broiler industry. Broiler prices, U. S. mid-month average at the local market I or farm) level, dropped from 17.6 cents per pound in February, 1961, to around 12-13 cents in midsummer. Questions have been raised whether such low prices cover production costs. If the industry should desire to stabilize production at prices which cover production costs, or alter broiler marketings and prices in some manner, Seasonal (within the year) and Year to year measures of demand and cost of production would be needed. Alternatives Demand and cost of production information can be used by individuals and groups to increase the industry's stability. Individual action—Estimates of future market prices and information on how to figure production costs could be disseminated to individual members of the industry. The individual could then adjust his own production as he saw best. Group action—Available supply and demand information could be used to determine the quantity of broilers needed to maintain a certain price level and a given price pattern within a year. Quantities that various individuals within the industry would produce would need to be determined. A device for stabilizing the industry through group action might be a marketing order. Members of the broiler industry and other agencies, both public and private, may wish to consider alternative methods of stabilizing extreme fluctuations in broiler production and broiler prices. This article presents some demand estimates of the kind required in whatever method may be employed. Seasonal Variations in Demand Demand in this article is defined as the quantity of broilers that buyers will take at a given price in a given market (the U. S.) at a given time (a certain month). Demand increases if buyers will take more at a given price than in a previous month, or if they w"l pay more for a given quantity than in a previous month. Demand decreases if buyers will take less at a g'ven price, or if they will not pay as much for a given quantity. A recent Purdue study1 shows that the low point in the demand for broilers has come in December l sec Figure 1). From the first of the vear through March. JDarley, Richard D., "Monthly Price Herniating Model? for Broilers,"' unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, August, 1961. The analysis is based on the 1948-60 period. The stud) was conducted under Purdue A.E.S. project 876. •constant marketings at December level INCREASING BROILER DEMAND Percent difference in marketings from December Figure 1. Estimated monthly broiler demand, December-July, 1948-60. This chart shows that in July, for example, an estimated 69.1 percent more broilers could be marketed than in December at the December price. Or, if quantity marketed in July would remain constant at the December level, the price in July would be an estimated 36.2 percent higher. DECREASING BROILER DEMAND %M 21.0 47.0 63.0 69.1 Percent difference in marketings from December Figure 2. Estimated monthly broiler demand, July- December, 1948-60. This chart shows that in August, for example, an estimated 63 percent more broilers could be marketed than in December at the December price. Or, if quantity marketed in August would remain constant at the December level, the price in August would be an estimated 33.6 percent higher. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Sep. 30, 1961)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Sep. 30, 1961)