Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1960) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS April 30, 1960 Again Pay Best Moderately Large Hog Enterprises by R. H. BAUMAN and L. EISGRUBER Agricultural Economics ADDITIONAL evidence indicates that size of enterprise is an important factor affecting costs and returns in producing hogs.1 Gains in production efficiencies appear to be most rapid up to 30- 40 sows and then increase more slowly up to 50-60 sows. Apparently, under present technologies, it's very difficult even for the best of managers to keep the hog business operating at peak levels of performance much beyond the 50- 60 sow herd size. While the total net returns from the hog enterprise may continue to increase in larger herds, it seems safe to say that this comes, in the main, from greater volume rather than from lower unit costs of production. THESE FINDINGS are based on a 1956-57, two-year study, of 130 central Indiana hog enterprises.- The herds ranged in size from 5 to 120 sows all on a two- litter basis. The data were adjusted to a corn-hog ratio of 13.6 to 1 (long-time Indiana average) with corn at $1.21 per bushel and hogs $16.50 per hundred, adjusted seasonally to more nearly reflect the average situation. Labor was charged at $1 per hour. Average costs and returns were calculated for seven, 10-sow interval, size groups. Various measures 'Progress report for the year 1956, first year or the study of AES Project No. 787, was published in "Economic and Marketing Information '"Indiana Farmers," July 29, 1958. "Includes 54 enterprises in 1956 and 76 en- 'srprises in 1957. Farms from which the data *ere obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe Counties. of costs tended to go down with increased size of enterprise up to 50 or 60 sows (Tables 1 and 2). Beyond this size of enterprise, unit costs tended to increase. However, the number of cooperators with larger herds was too small to give much reliability to the results. At least constant costs and returns do seem possible in somewhat larger herds though evidence from the study is lacking to back this up (Figures 1 and 2). Small Declines in All Major Cost Items Up to the 50-60 sow herd size small decreases tended to occur in all major cost categories—feed, man labor, building use, equipment use and miscellaneous. After this, total costs increased. Difference in total costs between the 10-sow and the 60-sow herd size amounted to about $2.20 per hundred or about $5 per hog marketed (Table 3). Net returns per man hour increased from about $1 for the 10- sow herds to about $4.50 per hour Table 1. Costs and Returns for Two-Litter Swine Enterprise by Number Of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana—Two Year 1956-57 Average.* S ze of Enterprise 10 sow 20 sow 30 sow 40 sow 50 sow 60 sow Over (5-1 A) (15-24) (25-34) (35-44) (45-54) (55-64) 65 Avg. Number of enterprises'' 25 32 34 19 9 5 6 130 Avg. number of sows farrowe d 10.9 20.3 29.6 40.1 50.3 60.1 97 30.2 Pigs farrowed per litter 8.9 8.4 8.5 8.1 8.3 8.2 9.4 8.5 Pigs weaned per litter 7.1 7.0 7.3 6.9 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.2 Pigs raised per litter 6.8 6.7 7.1 6.5 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.8 Avg. wt. market hogs sold—Ibs. 216 214 217 221 215 218 217 217 Per Enterprise Net return to labor and mgt. $391 $1058 $2052 $3220 $4460 $4820 $7340 $2175 Net return to management 25 485 1260 2285 3340 3410 5850 1380 Per Sow and Two-Litters Total receipts (incl. inv. chang e) $517 $ 468 $ 543 $ 503 $ 510 $ 474 $ 499 $ 508 Total costs (incl. labor) 514 442 501 446 444 418 449 472 Net return 3 26 42 57 66 56 50 36 Per Hundredweight Hogs Produced Total receipts (incl. inv. change) $16.83 $16.43 $16.87 $16.77 $16.59 $16.70 $16.83 $16.72 Total costs (incl. labor) 16.86 15.62 15.78 14.86 14.56 14.50 15.21 15.64 Net return -.03 .81 1.09 1.91 2.03 2.20 1.62 1.08 Uni costs and returns Net return per man hour $ .98 $ 1.36 $ 2.23 $ 3.20 $ 4.44 $ 2.62 $ 4.02 $ 2.19 Gross return per $ feed fed 1.55 1.69 1.61 1.67 1.74 1.77 1.57 1.64 Cost per weaned pig (incl. labor) 10.57 7.92 8.58 7.40 5.93 6.17 7.24 8.29 Farms from which these data were obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe Counties. 54 enterprises in 1956; 76 in 1957. Detailed records were kept on the 130 enterprises which ranged from 4 to 120 sows.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1960) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196004 |
Date of Original | 1960 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/12/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ196004.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1960) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ196004 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS April 30, 1960 Again Pay Best Moderately Large Hog Enterprises by R. H. BAUMAN and L. EISGRUBER Agricultural Economics ADDITIONAL evidence indicates that size of enterprise is an important factor affecting costs and returns in producing hogs.1 Gains in production efficiencies appear to be most rapid up to 30- 40 sows and then increase more slowly up to 50-60 sows. Apparently, under present technologies, it's very difficult even for the best of managers to keep the hog business operating at peak levels of performance much beyond the 50- 60 sow herd size. While the total net returns from the hog enterprise may continue to increase in larger herds, it seems safe to say that this comes, in the main, from greater volume rather than from lower unit costs of production. THESE FINDINGS are based on a 1956-57, two-year study, of 130 central Indiana hog enterprises.- The herds ranged in size from 5 to 120 sows all on a two- litter basis. The data were adjusted to a corn-hog ratio of 13.6 to 1 (long-time Indiana average) with corn at $1.21 per bushel and hogs $16.50 per hundred, adjusted seasonally to more nearly reflect the average situation. Labor was charged at $1 per hour. Average costs and returns were calculated for seven, 10-sow interval, size groups. Various measures 'Progress report for the year 1956, first year or the study of AES Project No. 787, was published in "Economic and Marketing Information '"Indiana Farmers," July 29, 1958. "Includes 54 enterprises in 1956 and 76 en- 'srprises in 1957. Farms from which the data *ere obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe Counties. of costs tended to go down with increased size of enterprise up to 50 or 60 sows (Tables 1 and 2). Beyond this size of enterprise, unit costs tended to increase. However, the number of cooperators with larger herds was too small to give much reliability to the results. At least constant costs and returns do seem possible in somewhat larger herds though evidence from the study is lacking to back this up (Figures 1 and 2). Small Declines in All Major Cost Items Up to the 50-60 sow herd size small decreases tended to occur in all major cost categories—feed, man labor, building use, equipment use and miscellaneous. After this, total costs increased. Difference in total costs between the 10-sow and the 60-sow herd size amounted to about $2.20 per hundred or about $5 per hog marketed (Table 3). Net returns per man hour increased from about $1 for the 10- sow herds to about $4.50 per hour Table 1. Costs and Returns for Two-Litter Swine Enterprise by Number Of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana—Two Year 1956-57 Average.* S ze of Enterprise 10 sow 20 sow 30 sow 40 sow 50 sow 60 sow Over (5-1 A) (15-24) (25-34) (35-44) (45-54) (55-64) 65 Avg. Number of enterprises'' 25 32 34 19 9 5 6 130 Avg. number of sows farrowe d 10.9 20.3 29.6 40.1 50.3 60.1 97 30.2 Pigs farrowed per litter 8.9 8.4 8.5 8.1 8.3 8.2 9.4 8.5 Pigs weaned per litter 7.1 7.0 7.3 6.9 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.2 Pigs raised per litter 6.8 6.7 7.1 6.5 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.8 Avg. wt. market hogs sold—Ibs. 216 214 217 221 215 218 217 217 Per Enterprise Net return to labor and mgt. $391 $1058 $2052 $3220 $4460 $4820 $7340 $2175 Net return to management 25 485 1260 2285 3340 3410 5850 1380 Per Sow and Two-Litters Total receipts (incl. inv. chang e) $517 $ 468 $ 543 $ 503 $ 510 $ 474 $ 499 $ 508 Total costs (incl. labor) 514 442 501 446 444 418 449 472 Net return 3 26 42 57 66 56 50 36 Per Hundredweight Hogs Produced Total receipts (incl. inv. change) $16.83 $16.43 $16.87 $16.77 $16.59 $16.70 $16.83 $16.72 Total costs (incl. labor) 16.86 15.62 15.78 14.86 14.56 14.50 15.21 15.64 Net return -.03 .81 1.09 1.91 2.03 2.20 1.62 1.08 Uni costs and returns Net return per man hour $ .98 $ 1.36 $ 2.23 $ 3.20 $ 4.44 $ 2.62 $ 4.02 $ 2.19 Gross return per $ feed fed 1.55 1.69 1.61 1.67 1.74 1.77 1.57 1.64 Cost per weaned pig (incl. labor) 10.57 7.92 8.58 7.40 5.93 6.17 7.24 8.29 Farms from which these data were obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe Counties. 54 enterprises in 1956; 76 in 1957. Detailed records were kept on the 130 enterprises which ranged from 4 to 120 sows. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1960)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1960)