Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1959) |
Previous | 1 of 8 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana April 30, 1959 How Are Indiana Hogs Grading} by JIM STEVENSON and NORTON SMITH, Agricultural Economics WHAT PORTION of all In- diana hogs slaughtered in the State are U.S. Number-One's? Estimates for both the Nation and the State have varied between 5 and 30 percent of U.S. No. l's. 23,225 carcasses graded Using USDA standards for pork carcasses (Table 1), Purdue livestock and meat specialists graded 23,225 pork carcasses in four major meat packing firms in central Indiana during 24 half-days in January and February of 1959. The four meat packing firms which cooperated in this grading study were the Emge Co. of Anderson, the Kingan Co. of Indianapolis, the Marhoefer Co. of Muncie, and the Stark-Wetzel Co. of Indianapolis. In an effort to eliminate any possible bias, the decision as to which of the plants would have their hogs graded in each half-day period was left to a random method of sampling. 23.5 percent number one's For the total sample of 23,225 hog carcasses, 23.5 percent were rail-graded as U.S. Number One's. The complete breakdown was as follows: Grade % of Total U.S. No. 1 23.5 U.S. No. 2 35.4 U.S. No. 3 40.7 Medium .4 Cull .0 100.0 The low percentage of under- finished hogs, medium and cull, can probably be largely attributed to the high hog-corn ratio preceding and during the time of the grading. Table 1. Weight and measurement guides to grades for barrow and gilt carcasses. Carcass weight or carcass length* Average back fat thickness (inches)** by grade U.S. No. 1 U.S. No. 2 U.S. No. 3 Medium Cull Under 120 Ibs. or under 27 inches. 1.2 to 1.5 1.5 to 1.8 1.8 or more 0.9 to 1.2 Less than 0.9. !20 to 164 Ibs. or 27 to 29.9 inches. 165 to 209 Ibs. or 1.3 to 1.6 1.6 to 1.9 1.9 or more 1.0 to 1.3 Less than 1.0. 30 to 32.9 inches. ^O or more Ibs. or 1.4 to 1.7 1.7 to 2.0 2.0 or more 1.1 to 1.4 Less than 1.1. _3^_or more inches. 1.5 to 1.8 1.8 to 2.1 2.1 or more 1.2 to 1.5 Less than 1.2. Either carcass weight or length may be used with back fat thickness as a reliable guide to grade The table shows the normal length range for given weights. In extreme cases where the use of length with back fat thickness indicates a different grade than by using weight, final grade ls determined subjectively as provided in the standards. Carcass weight is based on a chilled, Packer style carcass. Carcass length is measured from the forward point of the aitch bone to the torward edge of the first rib. "Average of measurements made opposite the first and last ribs and last lumbar vertebra. high, low individual lots The highest percentage of U.S. No. l's for a one-half day kill was 41.5 percent. The lowest was 13.5 percent of U.S. No. l's. Looking at the other extreme, the highest percent of U.S. No. 3's was 54.6, while the lowest percent of U.S. No. 3's was 23.6 application of research In considering this data as an indication of the quality of Indiana hogs, it must be remembered that the grading was performed during only one season of one year. Additional grading studies will yield further information on Indiana hog quality and quality trends.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1959) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195904 |
Date of Original | 1959 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/12/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ195904.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1959) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195904 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana April 30, 1959 How Are Indiana Hogs Grading} by JIM STEVENSON and NORTON SMITH, Agricultural Economics WHAT PORTION of all In- diana hogs slaughtered in the State are U.S. Number-One's? Estimates for both the Nation and the State have varied between 5 and 30 percent of U.S. No. l's. 23,225 carcasses graded Using USDA standards for pork carcasses (Table 1), Purdue livestock and meat specialists graded 23,225 pork carcasses in four major meat packing firms in central Indiana during 24 half-days in January and February of 1959. The four meat packing firms which cooperated in this grading study were the Emge Co. of Anderson, the Kingan Co. of Indianapolis, the Marhoefer Co. of Muncie, and the Stark-Wetzel Co. of Indianapolis. In an effort to eliminate any possible bias, the decision as to which of the plants would have their hogs graded in each half-day period was left to a random method of sampling. 23.5 percent number one's For the total sample of 23,225 hog carcasses, 23.5 percent were rail-graded as U.S. Number One's. The complete breakdown was as follows: Grade % of Total U.S. No. 1 23.5 U.S. No. 2 35.4 U.S. No. 3 40.7 Medium .4 Cull .0 100.0 The low percentage of under- finished hogs, medium and cull, can probably be largely attributed to the high hog-corn ratio preceding and during the time of the grading. Table 1. Weight and measurement guides to grades for barrow and gilt carcasses. Carcass weight or carcass length* Average back fat thickness (inches)** by grade U.S. No. 1 U.S. No. 2 U.S. No. 3 Medium Cull Under 120 Ibs. or under 27 inches. 1.2 to 1.5 1.5 to 1.8 1.8 or more 0.9 to 1.2 Less than 0.9. !20 to 164 Ibs. or 27 to 29.9 inches. 165 to 209 Ibs. or 1.3 to 1.6 1.6 to 1.9 1.9 or more 1.0 to 1.3 Less than 1.0. 30 to 32.9 inches. ^O or more Ibs. or 1.4 to 1.7 1.7 to 2.0 2.0 or more 1.1 to 1.4 Less than 1.1. _3^_or more inches. 1.5 to 1.8 1.8 to 2.1 2.1 or more 1.2 to 1.5 Less than 1.2. Either carcass weight or length may be used with back fat thickness as a reliable guide to grade The table shows the normal length range for given weights. In extreme cases where the use of length with back fat thickness indicates a different grade than by using weight, final grade ls determined subjectively as provided in the standards. Carcass weight is based on a chilled, Packer style carcass. Carcass length is measured from the forward point of the aitch bone to the torward edge of the first rib. "Average of measurements made opposite the first and last ribs and last lumbar vertebra. high, low individual lots The highest percentage of U.S. No. l's for a one-half day kill was 41.5 percent. The lowest was 13.5 percent of U.S. No. l's. Looking at the other extreme, the highest percent of U.S. No. 3's was 54.6, while the lowest percent of U.S. No. 3's was 23.6 application of research In considering this data as an indication of the quality of Indiana hogs, it must be remembered that the grading was performed during only one season of one year. Additional grading studies will yield further information on Indiana hog quality and quality trends. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1959)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Apr. 30, 1959)