Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 29, 1958) |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS July 29, 1958 Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana INDIANA FARMERS Moderately Large Hog Enterprises Pay Best by R. H. BAUMAN and PAT POWLEN, Agricultural Economics (Based upon Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station Project # 787) ET RETURNS to two-litter hog producers on 54 central Indiana farms increased a little faster than herd-size up to 40 or 50 sows. Although the total net returns increased as the enterprises got bigger than this, due to increased volume, the net returns per unit of production tended to drop slightly. The 1956 data were adjusted to a corn-hog ratio of 13.6 to 1 (long-time Indiana average) with corn at $1.28 per bushel and hogs $17.40, adjusted seasonally, to more nearly reflect the average situation. Various measures of returns tended to go up as size of enterprise increased, up to the 40 or 50 sow level (Table 1). Beyond this Table 2. Financial and Physical Requirements for Two-litter Swine Enterprise by Number of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana, 1956. Size of Enterprise 10-sow 20-sow 30-sow 40-tow 50-sow 60-sow 120-sow Avg. Number of farms Total feed Buildings & Equipment Breeding Herd (incl. boars) All other Total investment 11 12 14 54 Investment per Sow and Two Litters $82 $67 $91 $74 267 210 208 183 84 77 76 77 56 46 58 48 489 400 433 382 S79 S72 S86 $78 193 193 183 214 71 87 85 78 50 52 51 52 393 404 405 424 Annual Use Costs Buildings & Equipment—per Sow and Two litters Buildings (fixed & portable) $31 $23 $24 $20 $23 $19 $20 $24 Equipment (fixed & portable) 12 7 11 10 5 13 5 10 Total annual use cost 43 30 35 30 28 32 25 34 Percent Various Costs Were of Total Costs Feed 67 67 70 70 71 Man labor 6 7 6 6 4 Building use 6 6 5 5 5 Machinery and equipment use 6 5 5 4 4 All other 15 15 14 15 16 Corn equivalent (lbs.) 35% protein equivalent (lbs.) Pig starter (lbs.) Mineral, salt, other (lbs.) Total feed (lbs.) Per sow & 2 litters to weaning Per 2 litters weaning to market Total man hours Per cwt. hogs produced Feed Requirements—per Cwt. Hogs Produced 408 347 28 36 4 5 2 2 442 390 365 39 7 2 413 Hours of Man Labor* 18 14 14 14 14 15 32 28 29 1.1 1.1 .9 351 36 10 2 399 9 14 23 .8 334 34 15 2 385 64 8 5 9 14 369 28 3 2 402 20 14 34 1.2 75 69 3 6 4 5 3 6 15 15 376 365 40 35 10 7 1 2 427 409 8 14 4 13 12 27 .4 .9 'Includes labor chargeable directly to hog enterprise. Table 1. Costs and Returns for Two-litter Swine Enterprise by Number of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana, 1956 Size of Enterprise 10-sow 20-sow 30-sow (5-14) (15-24) (25-34) 40-sow (35-44) 50-sow (45-54) 60-sow (55-64) 120-sow (Over 65) Avg. Number of farms Avg. number of sows farrowed ngs farrowed per litter Pigs weaned per litter rigs raised per litter Avg. weight hogs sold-pounds 11 12 14 10.1 20.6 29.8 9.0 8.2 8.7 7.0 6.9 7.6 6.6 6.6 7.4 212 213 221 7 39.6 7.9 6.8 6.3 222 6 48.8 8.4 7.3 7.0 211 2 63.8 7.8 7.1 6.6 229 2 120.0 9.2 7.4 6.9 218 54 31.7 8.5 7.2 6.8 217 Net return to labor and management Per Enterprise $820 $2035 $3755 $5494 $6750 $6824 $11864 $3747 Per Sow and Two-litter Total receipts Total costs (incl. labor) Net return $536 $474 $621 495 402 524 41 72 97 $538 426 112 $560 441 119 $520 447 73 $543 458 85 $547 464 83 Total receipts Total costs (incl. labor) Net return Per Hundred Weight Hogi $18.04 $17.72 $18.39 16.94 15.34 15.60 1.10 2.58 2.79 Produced $19.04 $18.03 15.06 14.28 3.98 3.75 $18.77 15.82 2.95 $18.08 15.23 2.85 $18.26 15.59 2.67 Unit Costs and Returns Net return per man hour' Jfoss return per $ feed fed <-°st per weaned pig (incl. labor) $2.65 $4.05 $4.94 1.66 1.80 1.72 13.00 10.76 1121 $4.97 1.86 11.05 $7.01 1.80 9.31 $ - 1.86 9.86 $ - 1.58 12.26 $4.38 1.75 11.31 For 47 farms, 10 to 50 sow size groups. Includes labor chargeable directly to hog enterprise only, farms from which these data were obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe counties, retailed records were kept on the 54 herds which ranged from 7 to 127 sows. point the number of cooperators was too small to give much reliability to the results. While the data suggest moderately declining returns to size beyond the 40-50 sow level, at least constant returns per sow are possible in the larger size groups. "Multiple farrowing" farms, that is, farms having two or more groups of sows farrowing a month or so apart in the spring and in the fall, had lower production costs. Most of the potential cost reduction in multiple farrowing, however, seems to have been achieved by the time two or three groups of sows, farrowing in suc- (Continued on Page 5, Col. 3)
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 29, 1958) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195807 |
Date of Original | 1958 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/12/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ195807.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 29, 1958) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195807 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS July 29, 1958 Prepared by the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana INDIANA FARMERS Moderately Large Hog Enterprises Pay Best by R. H. BAUMAN and PAT POWLEN, Agricultural Economics (Based upon Purdue Agricultural Experiment Station Project # 787) ET RETURNS to two-litter hog producers on 54 central Indiana farms increased a little faster than herd-size up to 40 or 50 sows. Although the total net returns increased as the enterprises got bigger than this, due to increased volume, the net returns per unit of production tended to drop slightly. The 1956 data were adjusted to a corn-hog ratio of 13.6 to 1 (long-time Indiana average) with corn at $1.28 per bushel and hogs $17.40, adjusted seasonally, to more nearly reflect the average situation. Various measures of returns tended to go up as size of enterprise increased, up to the 40 or 50 sow level (Table 1). Beyond this Table 2. Financial and Physical Requirements for Two-litter Swine Enterprise by Number of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana, 1956. Size of Enterprise 10-sow 20-sow 30-sow 40-tow 50-sow 60-sow 120-sow Avg. Number of farms Total feed Buildings & Equipment Breeding Herd (incl. boars) All other Total investment 11 12 14 54 Investment per Sow and Two Litters $82 $67 $91 $74 267 210 208 183 84 77 76 77 56 46 58 48 489 400 433 382 S79 S72 S86 $78 193 193 183 214 71 87 85 78 50 52 51 52 393 404 405 424 Annual Use Costs Buildings & Equipment—per Sow and Two litters Buildings (fixed & portable) $31 $23 $24 $20 $23 $19 $20 $24 Equipment (fixed & portable) 12 7 11 10 5 13 5 10 Total annual use cost 43 30 35 30 28 32 25 34 Percent Various Costs Were of Total Costs Feed 67 67 70 70 71 Man labor 6 7 6 6 4 Building use 6 6 5 5 5 Machinery and equipment use 6 5 5 4 4 All other 15 15 14 15 16 Corn equivalent (lbs.) 35% protein equivalent (lbs.) Pig starter (lbs.) Mineral, salt, other (lbs.) Total feed (lbs.) Per sow & 2 litters to weaning Per 2 litters weaning to market Total man hours Per cwt. hogs produced Feed Requirements—per Cwt. Hogs Produced 408 347 28 36 4 5 2 2 442 390 365 39 7 2 413 Hours of Man Labor* 18 14 14 14 14 15 32 28 29 1.1 1.1 .9 351 36 10 2 399 9 14 23 .8 334 34 15 2 385 64 8 5 9 14 369 28 3 2 402 20 14 34 1.2 75 69 3 6 4 5 3 6 15 15 376 365 40 35 10 7 1 2 427 409 8 14 4 13 12 27 .4 .9 'Includes labor chargeable directly to hog enterprise. Table 1. Costs and Returns for Two-litter Swine Enterprise by Number of Sows in Herd, Central Indiana, 1956 Size of Enterprise 10-sow 20-sow 30-sow (5-14) (15-24) (25-34) 40-sow (35-44) 50-sow (45-54) 60-sow (55-64) 120-sow (Over 65) Avg. Number of farms Avg. number of sows farrowed ngs farrowed per litter Pigs weaned per litter rigs raised per litter Avg. weight hogs sold-pounds 11 12 14 10.1 20.6 29.8 9.0 8.2 8.7 7.0 6.9 7.6 6.6 6.6 7.4 212 213 221 7 39.6 7.9 6.8 6.3 222 6 48.8 8.4 7.3 7.0 211 2 63.8 7.8 7.1 6.6 229 2 120.0 9.2 7.4 6.9 218 54 31.7 8.5 7.2 6.8 217 Net return to labor and management Per Enterprise $820 $2035 $3755 $5494 $6750 $6824 $11864 $3747 Per Sow and Two-litter Total receipts Total costs (incl. labor) Net return $536 $474 $621 495 402 524 41 72 97 $538 426 112 $560 441 119 $520 447 73 $543 458 85 $547 464 83 Total receipts Total costs (incl. labor) Net return Per Hundred Weight Hogi $18.04 $17.72 $18.39 16.94 15.34 15.60 1.10 2.58 2.79 Produced $19.04 $18.03 15.06 14.28 3.98 3.75 $18.77 15.82 2.95 $18.08 15.23 2.85 $18.26 15.59 2.67 Unit Costs and Returns Net return per man hour' Jfoss return per $ feed fed <-°st per weaned pig (incl. labor) $2.65 $4.05 $4.94 1.66 1.80 1.72 13.00 10.76 1121 $4.97 1.86 11.05 $7.01 1.80 9.31 $ - 1.86 9.86 $ - 1.58 12.26 $4.38 1.75 11.31 For 47 farms, 10 to 50 sow size groups. Includes labor chargeable directly to hog enterprise only, farms from which these data were obtained are in Carroll, Clinton, Miami, Montgomery and Tippecanoe counties, retailed records were kept on the 54 herds which ranged from 7 to 127 sows. point the number of cooperators was too small to give much reliability to the results. While the data suggest moderately declining returns to size beyond the 40-50 sow level, at least constant returns per sow are possible in the larger size groups. "Multiple farrowing" farms, that is, farms having two or more groups of sows farrowing a month or so apart in the spring and in the fall, had lower production costs. Most of the potential cost reduction in multiple farrowing, however, seems to have been achieved by the time two or three groups of sows, farrowing in suc- (Continued on Page 5, Col. 3) |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 29, 1958)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Jul. 29, 1958)