Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 28, 1957) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
February 28, 1957 Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Does Your Area Need Another Livestock Market? by PATRICK L. LUBY and CLIFTON B. COX Agricultural Economics A NOT HER market outlet does not -£*- necessarily mean more competition and higher prices for your livestock! More markets may mean a less efficient livestock marketing system since many markets are too small to gain the efficiencies resulting from a large volume. With a small volume, costs of handling each unit of livestock may be so high that it is not a competitive market for your livestock. But neither do small markets necessarily mean lower prices to the farmers. Operators of small markets may absorb part of their costs by- accepting lower income for themselves. A market is like your farm in many respects. It is more efficient if it handles enough livestock to keep the manager and employees productively employed and buildings and other facilities fully utilized. It should handle enough livestock every day for truck or car-lot shipments. Research at Purdue indicates that the per-animal cost of handling livestock at both dealer-packer and auction markets are very high for most markets handling fewer than 30,000 marketing units per year. The average cost per unit continues to decline at least until the market handles over 100,000 units per year. This does not mean that all small units are less efficient than large °nes. But it does mean that usually jne per-unit cost of handling your 'ivestock decreases as markets become larger. Even though it appears that Indiana has enough total markets, an enterprising firm may still make a Recess of a new market. But it would Jave to do an excellent job with ?ood prices and services to farmers and have a low cost of operation. 5ucn a firm could force inefficient or small markets to operate more efficiently or to go out of business. This would actually improve the livestock marketing system. The ideal situation would be for you to have a choice among several efficient and competitive markets which have good outlets for livestock. In judging how many markets can best do the job, we must have a sufficient number of markets within a reasonable distance from each livestock farm to assure a competitive pricing system and yet not so many that they are too small and therefore, inefficient. What's Happening to Livestock Markets in Indiana? The number of livestock markets in Indiana has continued to increase. Two hundred thirty-three livestock markets, handling about 9 million head of livestock (Figure 1), were serving the farmers in Indiana in 1956. This is an increase of 19 markets since 1951, 45 more than in 1941. Four posted markets (Indianapolis, Evansville. Muncie and Ft. Wayne), 159 dealer and packer markets and 70 auctions or salebarns made up the total. Dealer and Packer Markets Are More Numerous, Smaller Dealer and packer markets have increased 23 percent during the last 5 years. But while the number increased the average size decreased 9 percent, from 28,400 marketing units in 1951 to 25,800 in 1956.1 Auction Markets Fewer But Larger The number of auction markets (salebarns) operating in Indiana increased from 59 in 1941 to 81 in 1 The different kinds of livestock have been converted into marketing units as follows: 1 hog = l unit; 1 cow =3.375 units; 1 calf=1.875 units; 1 sheep or lamb = 0.750 units.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 28, 1957) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195702 |
Date of Original | 1957 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/11/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ195702.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 28, 1957) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195702 |
Transcript | February 28, 1957 Economic and Marketing Information FOR INDIANA FARMERS Does Your Area Need Another Livestock Market? by PATRICK L. LUBY and CLIFTON B. COX Agricultural Economics A NOT HER market outlet does not -£*- necessarily mean more competition and higher prices for your livestock! More markets may mean a less efficient livestock marketing system since many markets are too small to gain the efficiencies resulting from a large volume. With a small volume, costs of handling each unit of livestock may be so high that it is not a competitive market for your livestock. But neither do small markets necessarily mean lower prices to the farmers. Operators of small markets may absorb part of their costs by- accepting lower income for themselves. A market is like your farm in many respects. It is more efficient if it handles enough livestock to keep the manager and employees productively employed and buildings and other facilities fully utilized. It should handle enough livestock every day for truck or car-lot shipments. Research at Purdue indicates that the per-animal cost of handling livestock at both dealer-packer and auction markets are very high for most markets handling fewer than 30,000 marketing units per year. The average cost per unit continues to decline at least until the market handles over 100,000 units per year. This does not mean that all small units are less efficient than large °nes. But it does mean that usually jne per-unit cost of handling your 'ivestock decreases as markets become larger. Even though it appears that Indiana has enough total markets, an enterprising firm may still make a Recess of a new market. But it would Jave to do an excellent job with ?ood prices and services to farmers and have a low cost of operation. 5ucn a firm could force inefficient or small markets to operate more efficiently or to go out of business. This would actually improve the livestock marketing system. The ideal situation would be for you to have a choice among several efficient and competitive markets which have good outlets for livestock. In judging how many markets can best do the job, we must have a sufficient number of markets within a reasonable distance from each livestock farm to assure a competitive pricing system and yet not so many that they are too small and therefore, inefficient. What's Happening to Livestock Markets in Indiana? The number of livestock markets in Indiana has continued to increase. Two hundred thirty-three livestock markets, handling about 9 million head of livestock (Figure 1), were serving the farmers in Indiana in 1956. This is an increase of 19 markets since 1951, 45 more than in 1941. Four posted markets (Indianapolis, Evansville. Muncie and Ft. Wayne), 159 dealer and packer markets and 70 auctions or salebarns made up the total. Dealer and Packer Markets Are More Numerous, Smaller Dealer and packer markets have increased 23 percent during the last 5 years. But while the number increased the average size decreased 9 percent, from 28,400 marketing units in 1951 to 25,800 in 1956.1 Auction Markets Fewer But Larger The number of auction markets (salebarns) operating in Indiana increased from 59 in 1941 to 81 in 1 The different kinds of livestock have been converted into marketing units as follows: 1 hog = l unit; 1 cow =3.375 units; 1 calf=1.875 units; 1 sheep or lamb = 0.750 units. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 28, 1957)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 28, 1957)