Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 26, 1955) |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Economic and Marketing INFORMATION FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by Members of the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana. February 26, 1955 Hog Shrinkage—farm to Market By JAMES R. WILEY, Animal Husbandry and CLIFTON B. COX, Agricultural Economics LIVESTOCK WEIGHS LESS when it reaches market than it does when it is loaded at the farm. This loss of weight is called "shrinkage." A large percentage of the shrinkage comes from the excretion of feces and urine. These have little or no commercial value and so cannot be classed as a direct economic loss, but may be a source of loss to the individual farmer. Under certain conditions, actual tissue loss may occur. This is a real loss. Shrinkage in hauling animals is due to many factors. Some of these are the kind of feeds fed on the farm. the amount of fill, the time the animals are in transit, the weight of the animals, the temperature, the method of handling the livestock in transit. the class of animals, and the type of transportation. For this discussion, we shall consider the effect of the length of haul on the shrinkage of hogs trucked from farm to market. However, we recognize there are so many other factors affecting shrinkage that it is not possible to isolate completely the effect of length of haul on shrinkage. For this analysis, farm weights and market weights were collected on approximately 38,000 hogs that were sold in 1,132 lots. Part of these were weighed without feeding at the market and part were fed before they Here weighed to the buyer. The hogs that were not fed are considered first. Distance Affected Shrinkage Length of haul to market had a definite effect on the amount of shrinkage of hogs. As is commonlv Wieved, the highest rate of shrinkage occurred in loading and the first few miles of the trip. Shrinkage for hogs not fed at the market averaged 1.06 percent of the farm weight for hauls up to five miles (Table 1). Shrinkage increased with the length of haul but at a decreasing rate (Figure 1). For hauls from 36 to 45 miles, shrinkage averaged 2.06 percent and for hauls 66 to 75 miles, it averaged 2.76 percent of the farm weight. From these data it can be seen that for the relatively long hauls of 66 to 75 miles, 40 percent of the shrinkage occurred in the first few miles of the haul even though the hogs were not fed at market. Market Feeding Helps Shrinkage can be reduced by feed ing hogs at the market. The amount of the reduction is closely related to distance. Shrinkage of hogs that were fed at the market averaged 1.03 percent for hauls from 6 to 15 miles instead of 1.12 for those not fed. Shrinkage averaged only 2.08 percent for the 66 to 75 mile hauls for hogs fed at the market as compared with 2.76 percent for those not fed. Even for hauls from 86 to 95 miles, shrinkage averaged only 2.16 percent when the hogs were fed at market. For the longest hauls one-half the shrinkage occurred in the loading and first few miles of the haul. The reduction secured in average shrinkage by feeding hogs at market is consistent. For hauls up to PERCENT SHRINKAGE MARKET 66-75 86-95 MILES (LENGTH OF HAUL) Figure 1. Note the effect of length of haul to market on the shrinkage of hogs fed and not fed at market.
Object Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 26, 1955) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195502 |
Date of Original | 1955 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Farm produce--Indiana--Marketing Agriculture--Economic aspects--Indiana |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Economic & Marketing Information (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension) |
Rights | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 03/02/2015 |
Digitization Specifications | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-econ195502.tif |
Description
Title | Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 26, 1955) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-econ195502 |
Transcript | Economic and Marketing INFORMATION FOR INDIANA FARMERS Prepared by Members of the Agricultural Staff of Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana. February 26, 1955 Hog Shrinkage—farm to Market By JAMES R. WILEY, Animal Husbandry and CLIFTON B. COX, Agricultural Economics LIVESTOCK WEIGHS LESS when it reaches market than it does when it is loaded at the farm. This loss of weight is called "shrinkage." A large percentage of the shrinkage comes from the excretion of feces and urine. These have little or no commercial value and so cannot be classed as a direct economic loss, but may be a source of loss to the individual farmer. Under certain conditions, actual tissue loss may occur. This is a real loss. Shrinkage in hauling animals is due to many factors. Some of these are the kind of feeds fed on the farm. the amount of fill, the time the animals are in transit, the weight of the animals, the temperature, the method of handling the livestock in transit. the class of animals, and the type of transportation. For this discussion, we shall consider the effect of the length of haul on the shrinkage of hogs trucked from farm to market. However, we recognize there are so many other factors affecting shrinkage that it is not possible to isolate completely the effect of length of haul on shrinkage. For this analysis, farm weights and market weights were collected on approximately 38,000 hogs that were sold in 1,132 lots. Part of these were weighed without feeding at the market and part were fed before they Here weighed to the buyer. The hogs that were not fed are considered first. Distance Affected Shrinkage Length of haul to market had a definite effect on the amount of shrinkage of hogs. As is commonlv Wieved, the highest rate of shrinkage occurred in loading and the first few miles of the trip. Shrinkage for hogs not fed at the market averaged 1.06 percent of the farm weight for hauls up to five miles (Table 1). Shrinkage increased with the length of haul but at a decreasing rate (Figure 1). For hauls from 36 to 45 miles, shrinkage averaged 2.06 percent and for hauls 66 to 75 miles, it averaged 2.76 percent of the farm weight. From these data it can be seen that for the relatively long hauls of 66 to 75 miles, 40 percent of the shrinkage occurred in the first few miles of the haul even though the hogs were not fed at market. Market Feeding Helps Shrinkage can be reduced by feed ing hogs at the market. The amount of the reduction is closely related to distance. Shrinkage of hogs that were fed at the market averaged 1.03 percent for hauls from 6 to 15 miles instead of 1.12 for those not fed. Shrinkage averaged only 2.08 percent for the 66 to 75 mile hauls for hogs fed at the market as compared with 2.76 percent for those not fed. Even for hauls from 86 to 95 miles, shrinkage averaged only 2.16 percent when the hogs were fed at market. For the longest hauls one-half the shrinkage occurred in the loading and first few miles of the haul. The reduction secured in average shrinkage by feeding hogs at market is consistent. For hauls up to PERCENT SHRINKAGE MARKET 66-75 86-95 MILES (LENGTH OF HAUL) Figure 1. Note the effect of length of haul to market on the shrinkage of hogs fed and not fed at market. |
Tags
Add tags for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 26, 1955)
Comments
Post a Comment for Economic and Marketing Information for Indiana Farmers (Feb. 26, 1955)