Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Mimeo DH-102 October, 1964 Milk Production Records Make Sense Willard Dillon, Extension Dairyman Any characteristic of an animal may be considered as being the sum of environmental effects and hereditary effects. Therefore, we can represent a milk production record as: Environmental Effects plus Hereditary Effects equals Milk Record. Milk production records, as well as most other economically important characteristics of animals vary greatly because they exist under a wide range of environments and are influenced by many thousands of genes. It is important to remember that the only part of this equation we can see and measure directly is the actual milk production record. As an example, let us consider a cow with milk records as follows: Year Production pounds 1960 10,000 1961 12,000 1962 9,000 1963 15,000 1964 14,000 If we add these annual production figures together and divide by five, we find the average record is 12,000 pounds. We know that this cow’s heredity did not change during the years in which she made the records. Since this is true, the variation in these records must result from environmental changes. These environmental changes result from changes in feeding and management. Now, to more easily make use of these records, let us write them as follows: Year Average production Environ. effect Actual production pounds pounds pounds 1960 12,000 - 2000 10,000 1961 12,000 0 12,000 1962 12,000 - 3000 9,000 1963 12,000 + 3000 15,000 1964 12,000 + 2000 14,000 If we knew that all cows’ average production is 10,000 pounds, we could estimate that the cow we used in this example had received a hereditary effect of 2000 pounds and we could rewrite the records as follows: Year Average prod. Heredity effect Environ. effect Actual record pounds pounds pounds pounds 1960 10,000 + 2000 - 2000 10,000 1961 10,000 + 2000 0 12,000 1962 10,000 + 2000 - 3000 9,000 1963 10,000 + 2000 + 3000 15,000 1964 10,000 + 2000 + 2000 14,000 In other words, we can write: Actual Record = Average of all Records + Hereditary Effect + Environmental Effect. Each cow’s record has an average part that is common to all records. This is the record that the average cow would make under average environment. It is the point from which we measure favorable (plus) or unfavorable (minus) changes in the hereditary effects and environmental effects. Dairy Section • Animal Sciences Department Cooperative Extension Service, PURDUE UNIVERSITY, Lafayette, Indiana
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoDH102 |
Title | Extension Mimeo DH, no. 102 (Oct. 1964) |
Title of Issue | Milk production records make sense |
Date of Original | 1964 |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo DH (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 07/29/2015 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoDH102.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo DH (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | Mimeo DH-102 October, 1964 Milk Production Records Make Sense Willard Dillon, Extension Dairyman Any characteristic of an animal may be considered as being the sum of environmental effects and hereditary effects. Therefore, we can represent a milk production record as: Environmental Effects plus Hereditary Effects equals Milk Record. Milk production records, as well as most other economically important characteristics of animals vary greatly because they exist under a wide range of environments and are influenced by many thousands of genes. It is important to remember that the only part of this equation we can see and measure directly is the actual milk production record. As an example, let us consider a cow with milk records as follows: Year Production pounds 1960 10,000 1961 12,000 1962 9,000 1963 15,000 1964 14,000 If we add these annual production figures together and divide by five, we find the average record is 12,000 pounds. We know that this cow’s heredity did not change during the years in which she made the records. Since this is true, the variation in these records must result from environmental changes. These environmental changes result from changes in feeding and management. Now, to more easily make use of these records, let us write them as follows: Year Average production Environ. effect Actual production pounds pounds pounds 1960 12,000 - 2000 10,000 1961 12,000 0 12,000 1962 12,000 - 3000 9,000 1963 12,000 + 3000 15,000 1964 12,000 + 2000 14,000 If we knew that all cows’ average production is 10,000 pounds, we could estimate that the cow we used in this example had received a hereditary effect of 2000 pounds and we could rewrite the records as follows: Year Average prod. Heredity effect Environ. effect Actual record pounds pounds pounds pounds 1960 10,000 + 2000 - 2000 10,000 1961 10,000 + 2000 0 12,000 1962 10,000 + 2000 - 3000 9,000 1963 10,000 + 2000 + 3000 15,000 1964 10,000 + 2000 + 2000 14,000 In other words, we can write: Actual Record = Average of all Records + Hereditary Effect + Environmental Effect. Each cow’s record has an average part that is common to all records. This is the record that the average cow would make under average environment. It is the point from which we measure favorable (plus) or unfavorable (minus) changes in the hereditary effects and environmental effects. Dairy Section • Animal Sciences Department Cooperative Extension Service, PURDUE UNIVERSITY, Lafayette, Indiana |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001