Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 4 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE, PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA (Fertilization) AY-256 Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Maximum Efficiency in Reduced Tillage Systems David B. Mengel, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University Soil erosion is a major problem facing farmers in many areas of the U.S. today. One practice which has demonstrated marked success at controlling erosion is conservation tillage. Reducing tillage and leaving a protective cover of crop residue does reduce erosion. However, in many situations, the practice can also lead to reduced uptake efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers. The objectives of this publication are 1) to describe some of the features of conservation tillage that can influence N use efficiency, 2) to explain the results of some recent research in the area, and 3) to outline alternatives for developing effective and efficient N fertilization programs for corn under different tillage systems. NITROGEN EFFICIENCY UNDER CONSERVATION TILLAGE In general, conservation tillage involves less mixing of the soil than conventional tillage systems and leaves more crop residues on the surface to serve as a protective mulch. However, the degree of mixing and residue incorporation varies greatly with the system used. Researchers in Indiana measured the percent of the soil surface covered by residue immediately after planting under a number of tillage systems. Their results (Figure 1) show residue cover ranging from less than 1 percent for moldboard plowing to over 90 percent for no-till. Chisel plowing, while considered a conservation tillage system, only left from 6 to 29 percent of the surface residue covered, depending on the type of residue being tilled (cornstalks, bean stubble, etc.) and the type of chisel being used. 100 80 ► % of Residue Cover Moldboard Ridge Spring Chisel No-till Plow Disk Tillage Figure 1. Tillage System Used and Percentage of Residue Cover After Planting.
Object Description
Title | Extension Mimeo AY, no. 256 (Aug. 1985) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoAY256 |
Title of Issue | Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Maximum Efficiency in Reduced Tillage Systems |
Date of Original | 1985 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo AY (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 08/12/2015 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoAY256.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoAY256 |
Title of Issue | Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Maximum Efficiency in Reduced Tillage Systems |
Date of Original | 1985 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo AY (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States-Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE, PURDUE UNIVERSITY, WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA (Fertilization) AY-256 Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Maximum Efficiency in Reduced Tillage Systems David B. Mengel, Department of Agronomy, Purdue University Soil erosion is a major problem facing farmers in many areas of the U.S. today. One practice which has demonstrated marked success at controlling erosion is conservation tillage. Reducing tillage and leaving a protective cover of crop residue does reduce erosion. However, in many situations, the practice can also lead to reduced uptake efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers. The objectives of this publication are 1) to describe some of the features of conservation tillage that can influence N use efficiency, 2) to explain the results of some recent research in the area, and 3) to outline alternatives for developing effective and efficient N fertilization programs for corn under different tillage systems. NITROGEN EFFICIENCY UNDER CONSERVATION TILLAGE In general, conservation tillage involves less mixing of the soil than conventional tillage systems and leaves more crop residues on the surface to serve as a protective mulch. However, the degree of mixing and residue incorporation varies greatly with the system used. Researchers in Indiana measured the percent of the soil surface covered by residue immediately after planting under a number of tillage systems. Their results (Figure 1) show residue cover ranging from less than 1 percent for moldboard plowing to over 90 percent for no-till. Chisel plowing, while considered a conservation tillage system, only left from 6 to 29 percent of the surface residue covered, depending on the type of residue being tilled (cornstalks, bean stubble, etc.) and the type of chisel being used. 100 80 ► % of Residue Cover Moldboard Ridge Spring Chisel No-till Plow Disk Tillage Figure 1. Tillage System Used and Percentage of Residue Cover After Planting. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 08/12/2015 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoAY256.tif |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001