Extension Mimeo AS, no. 370 (Sep. 1967) |
Previous | 1 of 2 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Pigs to Pork MANAGEMENT Feed Processing for Swine 0. R. Zimmerman, and V. B. Mayrose, Animal Sciences Department AS -370 Sept. 1967 Definition feeder space for supplement. If not, they will not eat enough protein. However, at the Processing feed for swine includes grind- same time it is also necessary to include ing, pelleting and methods of preserving some alfalfa meal and/or meat meal in the (drying and ensiling). protein supplement to decrease its palata- j bility. This is to prevent excessive consump- How much feed processing is necessary for tion of expensive protein supplements. With maximum profits? the CMR system the producer knows the ex- act proportions of protein, vitamins and min-It would be great if this question had one erals the pigs are eating. The CMR lends simple answer, but it doesn't. For example, itself well to an automatic feeding system, the answer may be different for the swine The FC system often works best when high producer using a pasture system and another moisture corn is fed. Whole kernels of high I using a confinement system. The most prof- moisture corn will not bridge in self-feeders I itable system may also be different for the as will ground corn. Also, whole corn can producer buying grain and the producer who be held longer after removal from the silo i raises all the grain he feeds. before spoilage than can ground high moisture corn. Free-choice (FC) versus the complete mixed ration (CMR) system Does it pay to grind grain? First, the feeding system dictates to There are two primary reasons for grind- some extent the amount or degree of feed ing grain for swine. First, if a CMR is to be processing. What are the pros and cons of used, it is necessary to grind grain so that it the FC and CMR systems? The research at can be mixed properly with other components various experiment stations does not agree of the ration. Second, research results in- that one of these systems is always the most dicate improved utilization of corn when it is profitable. At the Purdue University Experi- ground before being fed. Evidently breaking ment Station the FC system has rather con- the kernel makes it easier for pigs to digest sistently been the most profitable. However, the corn. The research indicates that a at other stations the CMR system has often medium or fine grind is necessary to obtain been the most profitable of the two systems. the desired response. There are several Most comparisons do indicate more rapid reasons for recommending a medium grind daily gains with the CMR system, but the re- as opposed to a fine grind. Finely ground suits vary in regard to feed efficiency. feed tends to bridge in self-feeders, and to blow when feeder lids are raised, increas- 10 To make the FC system work properly ing feed wastage. There are indications that it is important that the pigs be allowed enough the incidence of gastric ulcers in swine is increased by finely ground feeds.
Object Description
Title | Extension Mimeo AS, no. 370 (Sep. 1967) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA-14-13-mimeoas370 |
Title of Issue | Feed Processing for Swine |
Author of Issue |
Zimmerman, Dwane R. Mayrose, Vernon B. |
Date of Original | 1967 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Swine--Feeding and feeds Corn as feed |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo AS (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 06/10/2015 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA-14-13-mimeoas370.tif |
Description
Title | Extension Mimeo AS, no. 370 (Sep. 1967) |
Purdue Identification Number | UA-14-13-mimeoas370 |
Title of Issue | Feed Processing for Swine |
Author of Issue |
Zimmerman, Dwane R. Mayrose, Vernon B. |
Date of Original | 1967 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Swine--Feed utilization efficiency Corn as feed |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Mimeo AS (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | Pigs to Pork MANAGEMENT Feed Processing for Swine 0. R. Zimmerman, and V. B. Mayrose, Animal Sciences Department AS -370 Sept. 1967 Definition feeder space for supplement. If not, they will not eat enough protein. However, at the Processing feed for swine includes grind- same time it is also necessary to include ing, pelleting and methods of preserving some alfalfa meal and/or meat meal in the (drying and ensiling). protein supplement to decrease its palata- j bility. This is to prevent excessive consump- How much feed processing is necessary for tion of expensive protein supplements. With maximum profits? the CMR system the producer knows the ex- act proportions of protein, vitamins and min-It would be great if this question had one erals the pigs are eating. The CMR lends simple answer, but it doesn't. For example, itself well to an automatic feeding system, the answer may be different for the swine The FC system often works best when high producer using a pasture system and another moisture corn is fed. Whole kernels of high I using a confinement system. The most prof- moisture corn will not bridge in self-feeders I itable system may also be different for the as will ground corn. Also, whole corn can producer buying grain and the producer who be held longer after removal from the silo i raises all the grain he feeds. before spoilage than can ground high moisture corn. Free-choice (FC) versus the complete mixed ration (CMR) system Does it pay to grind grain? First, the feeding system dictates to There are two primary reasons for grind- some extent the amount or degree of feed ing grain for swine. First, if a CMR is to be processing. What are the pros and cons of used, it is necessary to grind grain so that it the FC and CMR systems? The research at can be mixed properly with other components various experiment stations does not agree of the ration. Second, research results in- that one of these systems is always the most dicate improved utilization of corn when it is profitable. At the Purdue University Experi- ground before being fed. Evidently breaking ment Station the FC system has rather con- the kernel makes it easier for pigs to digest sistently been the most profitable. However, the corn. The research indicates that a at other stations the CMR system has often medium or fine grind is necessary to obtain been the most profitable of the two systems. the desired response. There are several Most comparisons do indicate more rapid reasons for recommending a medium grind daily gains with the CMR system, but the re- as opposed to a fine grind. Finely ground suits vary in regard to feed efficiency. feed tends to bridge in self-feeders, and to blow when feeder lids are raised, increas- 10 To make the FC system work properly ing feed wastage. There are indications that it is important that the pigs be allowed enough the incidence of gastric ulcers in swine is increased by finely ground feeds. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 06/10/2015 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA-14-13-mimeoas370.tif |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Extension Mimeo AS, no. 370 (Sep. 1967)