Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 2 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Agricultural Science Digest PURDUE UNIVERSITY Vol. 13, Jan. - Feb., 1971 IS FEEDER CATTLE PRECONDITIONING WORTHWHILE? There is, apparently, very little differ- ence in feedlot performance of cattle under various handling practices before shipment, when the amount of exposure and stress placed upon them is minimal and cattle are shipped directly from farm or ranch to feed- lot. Cost of the preconditioning practices to the rancher varied from $2.54 to $3.17 per hundredweight. This study, recently completed at Purdue, answered the major issues revolving around discussions of preconditioning programs for feeder cattle--first, the amount of economic benefit or sacrifice to the producer; and sec- ond, what constitutes a preconditioning pro- gram. Preconditioning has been defined as a program of preparing cattle to withstand the stress of movement and to prevent the spread of diseases peculiar to movement of the animals. The study was designed to control and measure both the physical and financial as- pects of four methods of handling and precon- ditioning feeder cattle. One hundred sixteen cattle were used and four methods tested. Cattle were weaned and shipped the same day, weaned about 30 days prior to shipment and placed on hay, grain, and supplement, vaccinated with bovine virus diarrhea vac- cine, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and parainfluenza - 3 vaccines approximately 45 days prior to shipment and weaned and shipped the same day; and, finally, weaned 30 days prior to shipment and vaccinated as in item 3. This is the first in a series of studies delving into the cost-benefit relationships of various preconditioning and handling pro- grams for feeder cattle. Journal paper 4040, K. B. Meyer, J. W. Judy, Jr., J. H. Armstrong, Department of Veterinary Science. THE IMMUNITY RESPONSE TO INFECTIOUS BRONCHITIS VIRUS A need has existed to devise a reliable means of investigating the immunity stimu- lated to infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in chickens. Serological tests and various other immunity challenge procedures to as- sess these responses have encountered var- iations in results. Although attempts at standardizing various techniques have been made, there is an important need to extend these efforts because of the increasingly complex pattern of infectious bronchitis virus that has evolved in recent years. This study concerns itself with criteria for evaluating the immune response to sev- eral IBV isolates from commercial vaccines. Among them: IBV serotype, dosage of chal- lenge virus, observation time for appearance of signs and obtaining of tracheal swabs, and attempted recovery of challenge virus. A fluorescent antibody technique was also used. The study showed that tracheal swabs were not reliable indicators after the third or fourth day PC, the fluorescent antibody technique was of value in detecting infection on the second, third and fourth days. Establishment of a reliable, uniform test for the virus will be of value to poultry- men and veterinarians in combating IBV. Journal paper 4090, R. W. Winterfield and A. M. Fadly, Dept, of Veterinary Science. AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION • COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoAG197104 |
Title | Agricultural Science Digest, vol. 13, no. 4 (Jan.-Feb., 1971) |
Title of Issue | Agricultural science digest |
Date of Original | 1971 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Agricultural Science Digest (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 12/14/2017 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoAG197104.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Agricultural Science Digest (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | Agricultural Science Digest PURDUE UNIVERSITY Vol. 13, Jan. - Feb., 1971 IS FEEDER CATTLE PRECONDITIONING WORTHWHILE? There is, apparently, very little differ- ence in feedlot performance of cattle under various handling practices before shipment, when the amount of exposure and stress placed upon them is minimal and cattle are shipped directly from farm or ranch to feed- lot. Cost of the preconditioning practices to the rancher varied from $2.54 to $3.17 per hundredweight. This study, recently completed at Purdue, answered the major issues revolving around discussions of preconditioning programs for feeder cattle--first, the amount of economic benefit or sacrifice to the producer; and sec- ond, what constitutes a preconditioning pro- gram. Preconditioning has been defined as a program of preparing cattle to withstand the stress of movement and to prevent the spread of diseases peculiar to movement of the animals. The study was designed to control and measure both the physical and financial as- pects of four methods of handling and precon- ditioning feeder cattle. One hundred sixteen cattle were used and four methods tested. Cattle were weaned and shipped the same day, weaned about 30 days prior to shipment and placed on hay, grain, and supplement, vaccinated with bovine virus diarrhea vac- cine, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and parainfluenza - 3 vaccines approximately 45 days prior to shipment and weaned and shipped the same day; and, finally, weaned 30 days prior to shipment and vaccinated as in item 3. This is the first in a series of studies delving into the cost-benefit relationships of various preconditioning and handling pro- grams for feeder cattle. Journal paper 4040, K. B. Meyer, J. W. Judy, Jr., J. H. Armstrong, Department of Veterinary Science. THE IMMUNITY RESPONSE TO INFECTIOUS BRONCHITIS VIRUS A need has existed to devise a reliable means of investigating the immunity stimu- lated to infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in chickens. Serological tests and various other immunity challenge procedures to as- sess these responses have encountered var- iations in results. Although attempts at standardizing various techniques have been made, there is an important need to extend these efforts because of the increasingly complex pattern of infectious bronchitis virus that has evolved in recent years. This study concerns itself with criteria for evaluating the immune response to sev- eral IBV isolates from commercial vaccines. Among them: IBV serotype, dosage of chal- lenge virus, observation time for appearance of signs and obtaining of tracheal swabs, and attempted recovery of challenge virus. A fluorescent antibody technique was also used. The study showed that tracheal swabs were not reliable indicators after the third or fourth day PC, the fluorescent antibody technique was of value in detecting infection on the second, third and fourth days. Establishment of a reliable, uniform test for the virus will be of value to poultry- men and veterinarians in combating IBV. Journal paper 4090, R. W. Winterfield and A. M. Fadly, Dept, of Veterinary Science. AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION • COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001