Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 2 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Agricultural Science Digest Vol. 13, Sept. - Oct., 1970 PURDUE UNIVERSITY COMPUTERIZED DECISION MAKING FOR FEEDLOTS? Is the computer a valuable tool for beef feedlot managers? A recent study indicates that a model for the formulation of informa- tion decision recommendations on the month- ly buying, selling, and feeding operations can be a useful, advantageous tool. The total information system included three sub-systems: a price forecasting sys- tem to predict future monthly prices; a beef feed formulation sub-system, to determine the minimum monthly cost of feeding, and an operations scheduling sub-system to deter- mine best selling, buying, and feeding deci- sions. In a three-year test, the researchers found that an information system which takes into account the operations and uncertainties of feedlots is feasible and could be operated at a nominal cost. Further research is need- ed to specifically determine the economic advantage of such a system. However, it has been determined that a nominal monthly cost will maintain the sys- tem, and that the cost of information is inde- pendent of the size of the feedlot. Larger feedlots may find use of a computerized in- formation system more economical, since charge can be spread over greater volume. Journal paper 4105, A. Gene Nelson and Ludwig M. Eisgruber, Department of Agri- cultural Economics. CAN SOLID WASTES BE A RESOURCE? Americans are one of the most affluent and effluent people of the world. Research indicates that more than a ton of waste per person is collected each year in the U.S. Waste volumes have been continually increas- ing, and with this increase has come a conse- quent jump in the problems of disposal. Solid waste problems aren't confined to cities, since solid wastes are also generated in rural areas, and these areas may be the recipients of urban wastes. The need for at- tention to wastes is acdentuated by the fact that rural governments often lack the man- power and finances to deal with solid waste problems. There are two basic approaches to the management of solid wastes--the "destroy and get-rid-of" method and the "useful re- source” approach; the latter emphasizing the use of solid wastes as a means of creating things of value and of improving the environ- ment rather than polluting it. Among the methods of disposal compatible with the use- ful resource approach are the sanitary land- fill, composting, reprocessing and recycling of metals and materials, and pyrolysis. If operated according to high standards, the sanitary landfill can be highly useful from an environmental quality viewpoint, since it can serve as a reclamation project, provide building sites or eventual recreation areas, or possibly even serve as a site for materials storage. More research is needed on the short and long-run costs of disposal strategies, in- cluding costs of externals, and on the econom- ics of laws, regulations, and environmental effects of various methods. A positive pro- gram for waste disposal can be of value to communities and areas, above and beyond just the removal of waste materials. More reliable and comprehensive economic infor- mation is needed for competent decision AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION • COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoAG197002 |
Title | Agricultural Science Digest, vol. 13, no. 2 (Sep.-Oct., 1970) |
Title of Issue | Agricultural science digest |
Date of Original | 1970 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Agricultural Science Digest (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 12/14/2017 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoAG197002.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Publisher | Purdue University. Cooperative Extension Service |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Agricultural Science Digest (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | Agricultural Science Digest Vol. 13, Sept. - Oct., 1970 PURDUE UNIVERSITY COMPUTERIZED DECISION MAKING FOR FEEDLOTS? Is the computer a valuable tool for beef feedlot managers? A recent study indicates that a model for the formulation of informa- tion decision recommendations on the month- ly buying, selling, and feeding operations can be a useful, advantageous tool. The total information system included three sub-systems: a price forecasting sys- tem to predict future monthly prices; a beef feed formulation sub-system, to determine the minimum monthly cost of feeding, and an operations scheduling sub-system to deter- mine best selling, buying, and feeding deci- sions. In a three-year test, the researchers found that an information system which takes into account the operations and uncertainties of feedlots is feasible and could be operated at a nominal cost. Further research is need- ed to specifically determine the economic advantage of such a system. However, it has been determined that a nominal monthly cost will maintain the sys- tem, and that the cost of information is inde- pendent of the size of the feedlot. Larger feedlots may find use of a computerized in- formation system more economical, since charge can be spread over greater volume. Journal paper 4105, A. Gene Nelson and Ludwig M. Eisgruber, Department of Agri- cultural Economics. CAN SOLID WASTES BE A RESOURCE? Americans are one of the most affluent and effluent people of the world. Research indicates that more than a ton of waste per person is collected each year in the U.S. Waste volumes have been continually increas- ing, and with this increase has come a conse- quent jump in the problems of disposal. Solid waste problems aren't confined to cities, since solid wastes are also generated in rural areas, and these areas may be the recipients of urban wastes. The need for at- tention to wastes is acdentuated by the fact that rural governments often lack the man- power and finances to deal with solid waste problems. There are two basic approaches to the management of solid wastes--the "destroy and get-rid-of" method and the "useful re- source” approach; the latter emphasizing the use of solid wastes as a means of creating things of value and of improving the environ- ment rather than polluting it. Among the methods of disposal compatible with the use- ful resource approach are the sanitary land- fill, composting, reprocessing and recycling of metals and materials, and pyrolysis. If operated according to high standards, the sanitary landfill can be highly useful from an environmental quality viewpoint, since it can serve as a reclamation project, provide building sites or eventual recreation areas, or possibly even serve as a site for materials storage. More research is needed on the short and long-run costs of disposal strategies, in- cluding costs of externals, and on the econom- ics of laws, regulations, and environmental effects of various methods. A positive pro- gram for waste disposal can be of value to communities and areas, above and beyond just the removal of waste materials. More reliable and comprehensive economic infor- mation is needed for competent decision AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION • COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001